Quantcast
Channel: Nature News - Latest Comments in Change for good
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 18 View Live

Re: Change for good

What a terribly disappointing error. The stated position on the Keystone XL pipeline is far outside the scientific consensus, common sense, and prudent journalistic leadership.Under what concrete,...

View Article



Re: Change for good

I salute Nature for an excellent, realistic, and pragmatic editorial. As you suggest, if he breaks out of the box President Obama can 'lay the foundation for something larger' in the national climate...

View Article

Re: Change for good

Frankly, only deniers, of one stripe or another, are focused today on the so-called "climate debate".That a Nature editorial on the defining facts-or-consequences issue of our time would be buttressed...

View Article

Re: Change for good

"Tar-sands development raises serious air- and water-quality issues in Canada, but these problems are well outside Obamaâ&#x80&#x99s jurisdiction."This is an offensive approach from a...

View Article

Re: Change for good

Gas might burn more cleanly than coal, but the overall global warming impact (including loss on capture) is not at all clear. While politically inconvenient, it may be that gas is a more polluting...

View Article


Re: Change for good

From these two statements,"...giving electricity generation another boost towards using plentiful natural gas"and"The president can also take advantage of rising domestic oil and gas production to...

View Article

Re: Change for good

When one reads the editorial "Change for good" in Nature one is given the impression that Canada's oil sands, shale oil and shale gas are good for our climate,"The Obama administration might be able to...

View Article

Re: Change for good

Irrespective of the influence of atmospheric CO2 levels on the world's climate, there is a moral imperative to reduce the extraction of irreplaceable minerals like oil, gas and tar sands. Minerals in...

View Article


Re: Change for good

On what basis should the administration "ensure that environmental standards are met"? If Nature were to review the Keystone FEIS posted on the Department of State's website, they would discover that...

View Article


Re: Change for good

This is one of the most misguided, irresponsible, and nonsensical editorials I've read outside of the WSJ. The piece is unworthy of a science-based publication and consists of non sequiturs and...

View Article

Re: Change for good

WOW. How very embarrassing. Expect more political statements from prominent scientific organizations. Either they don't realize they are doing it or they are intentionally and cynically destroying what...

View Article

Re: Change for good

The political naivete of this editorial is breathtaking and heartbreaking. I have covered climate science &#8211 and the politics of energy &#8211 as a journalist since 1988, and have never...

View Article

Re: Change for good

> the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry oilI'm guessing that -- for the pipeline companies -- capturing the right-of-way directly from Canada to the Gulf is the big money issue here. Oil's...

View Article


Re: Change for good

This article lacks any serious perspective.For starters, the link you refer to states that Shell's Quest effort will "store deep underground more than one million tonnes a year of CO2 produced in...

View Article

Re: Change for good

With all its errors and lack of perspective and total lack lack of scientific references, I wonder :Who wrote this silly story in this Nature editorial, and who approved it ?

View Article


Re: Change for good

Ah! Here is the reason that Shell engaged in the carbon capture Quest that this Nature editor now uses as an argument to approve the Keystone XL :http://www.ogj.com/articles/20..."Royal Dutch Shell PLC...

View Article

Re: Change for good

He has done many.The things that are happening, because of him is very good. He has introduced free health care, for all the people in america. As confirmed by hime that we will make sure that the...

View Article


Re: Change for good

Absolutely disgusted with this article not only as a scientist, but as a Canadian. "Tar-sands development raises serious air- and water-quality issues in Canada, but these problems are well outside...

View Article
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 18 View Live




Latest Images